Thursday, June 25, 2009

Paper Chaser

June 25, 2009

Changi has bagged 12

I THANK readers who wrote in response to the report, 'Down - Changi slips to third spot in global airport ranking survey' (June 11), about the results of the recent Skytrax survey.

We are encouraged by the letters of support and grateful for the ideas and suggestions to improve Changi Airport.

Their passionate response affirms our belief that Changi Airport holds a special place in the hearts and minds of many Singaporeans and airport users.

The Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore shares the same desire to achieve the highest standards at Changi Airport. External awards and surveys are an important source of feedback on how well we are serving our customers.

Each year, we monitor our performance in a basket of more than 30 surveys and we aim to do well in each survey. Last year, we won a record 30 awards and accolades.

In the first six months of this year, we have won 12 out of 14 best airport awards.

This bears testimony to the hard work and tireless efforts of all airport staff and our airport partners - ground handlers, immigration, Customs, police, tenants, service providers and more.

Every award won is not taken for granted and any award lost is taken seriously. We scrutinise every available survey report to learn where we may have fallen short so as to serve our customers better.

For the Skytrax survey, we have developed an action plan to improve the cleanliness of toilets and are also working closely with security agencies to improve the experience of passengers during security processing.

While every award we win is an encouragement for airport staff that they have done well, winning awards is but one source of feedback we get from airport users that we are on the right track.

Ultimately, the final judge is the thousands of passengers we serve each day, and we, with all our partners at Changi Airport, aim to give each individual passenger a consistently user-friendly, enjoyable and hassle-free experience.

Foo Sek Min
Senior Director (Airport Management)
Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore

A few day ago there was report that Singapore Changi has lost it top spot to Incheon and Hong Kong.

Today we see a CAAS Director responding and defending Changi so much as to mention Changi has won 12 our of the 14 possible awards. Note it is not enough for him just to say Changi won 12 but must highlight that Changi won 12 our of 14.

Geez… I know our education system produce paper chaser and this letter has proved our government agencies mentality are the same as well.

How significant are these award? Why in the first place there are bloody 14 awards? If it is really important, there should just be one award.

So CAAS are just like trophies collector. Just grab everything out there even if the award is given by Tan Chow Keng’s coffee shop.

Note Sek Min said “any award lost is taken seriously”, talk about kiasu.

To me you just have to do your best and if these reward come by it is a sign of your good work. But looking at Sek Min’s replies, it seem that winning rewards is the object of our dear CAAS. So can just care no shit about people like you and me giving feedback but they just suck up to those awards giving organization.

E.G Mr Award Giver A say that the Changi will score more point if they play Jazz music in the toilet. So to win this award, I bet CAAS will just play Jazz music.

Finally Sek Min said “every award we win is an encouragement for airport staff that they have done well”, I just cannot help to wonder what happened to those staff that caused Changi to loose that 2 out of 14 awards.


The Chansters said...

Mr Chan writes:

This is Singapore at its best. All they live for is to win awards. I mean, what is the point of going to tell people how many awards that you have won and so on just to defend the lost in rankings. If you are good, you are need to talk so much wan. Just do your job!

The Chansters said...

so wanna watch transformers together?

neobc said...

The Director's my S3 Department's Specialist. CO always liked to use him to do telts...and he addressed me as "Neo" instead of "Sir"...not that I wanted it, but wondered if it's more for the other Specialists to see how he's regarded by the Officers?

HH said...

Look like Seageant Foo is a scholar with the gahment to be a Director.

To me I still regard my NS officer as Sir. Although we are quite friendly and the offices treat us Spec as friend I still think we must give face mah. Especially infront of the men.

So Seageant Foo behaviour speaks much of how lousy his character is and alos how highly he think he is.


PS: Small World!