Monday, August 06, 2007

Blood Donation

Few months ago I actually am contemplating to donate blood.

Being a first time donor, I did a little surfing on the net to find out where and how do about doing it. And guess what… I am not eligible to donate as I spend a couple of years in UK. Look like I can never be a blood donor.

So if you are poor Singaporean who never visited Europe. Then we want your blood to save people who had been staying in Europe. Haa… my propaganda.

· Donors who have spent three months or more cumulatively in the United Kingdom from 1980 through 1996 (i.e. from 1 January 1980 through 31 December 1996) will be permanently deferred from any type of blood donation.

· Donors who have spent five years or more cumulatively in France from 1980 to the present will be permanently deferred from any type of blood donation.

· Donors who have lived cumulatively for 5 years or more in Europe (excluding France and UK) from 1980 to the present will be permanently deferred for whole blood donation but they can donate plasma by plasmapheresis only (Provided wt >51 kg and Haemoglobin >12.5 g/dl).


Source From:

http://www.hsa.gov.sg/internet/dcController?next=i_donorcare_question

I find the last point a bit "cock". Say if you go Europe every year for holiday or work for 2 months cumulatively every year. So after 30 years you cannot be a blood donor.

2 comments:

Mr & Mrs Chan said...

i think they are scared u got the mad cow disease cos u stayed in UK for more than 3 months liao...

HH said...

Yes but look at the last point. If you have cumulative of 5 years you are not allow to donate blood.

So let say after 30 years you have accumulate 5 years of your life in Europe.

Then you go donate blood and somehow something went wrong and they traced it to you. Then you are in BIG trouble.

"All donors should read through "An Important Message to Blood Donors" and clarify any queries or doubts before they donate blood. All donors are required to answer every question truthfully. Any answer, which is false or misleading, would render them liable to prosecution for supplying false information under the Infectious Diseases Act."