The silent killer.

Last December I went for the 2nd company sponsor medical check up and all was well just that I am slightly overweight and has a high Triglyceride level. (Too much oil in blood) and my blood pressure are slightly high.

My triglyceride level last year was like at a border high but it did drop from a high from 2 years ago.


This has partly due to my effort of exercising more and also the reduction of unhealthy food intakes.

My company is promoting a healthy lifestyle this year and for this month we all got free basic health test in the company.

They took my blood and now I am just waiting to see how my Triglyceride level.

My blood pressure was 130/85. A moderate high and it shows a pre-hypertension signal.
This may be due to my family history of hypertension.

It is not serious yet but at least it again reminds me to watch my diet, keep myself stress free and to exercise more.

This health screening findings did not surprise me as I do go for my bi-annual health check which give me a indication of my health level so I can force or motivate myself to eat right and spend more time sweating it out.

But this is not the case for a few of my colleague.

They all look ok and are quite skinny.

One of them blood pressure was like 200+ which indicate a level 2 hypertension. She was shocked as she felt nothing.

Another’s cholesterol level was sky high and he was quite depressed as he can’t enjoy his sea food as much as he wants now.

Funny thing is, even though this health screening is free, many of my colleague did not bother to sign up for it.

A few gave me reasons like no time; they feel fine and some even said they don’t want to know what is wrong with them inside!

I keep telling them that early detection is the best cure for any disease but they just brush me off.

I knew a few colleague and friend’s parents passed away recently suddenly for various reasons but they scary part was they all looked healthy.

An obese person may know he needs to watch his diet but a skinny person may think he is healthy and literally eat his way to the graves.

There are many diseases out there that won’t give us any signal but they all can be cured if detected early.

So I do urge all my friends to go for you medical check up at least once every 2-3 years.
It only cost you a few hundreds dollars and a few hours of your time.

As I always say, health is priceless.

Toothless Tiger

Abercrombie & Fitch ad 'indecent' but will stay for now
Watchdog calls for its removal but has no legal right to enforce decision

The advertisement featuring a topless man that is plastered on the Orchard shopfront of American fashion retailer Abercrombie & Fitch breaches the local advertising code of decency, said a watchdog.

The Advertising Standards Authority of Singapore (ASAS), which made the ruling, has called for the ad - put up after April - to be removed.

But there is a hitch - ASAS has no legal rights to enforce its decision. The picture of a model wearing a pair of low-slung jeans, which spans the entire four-level shopfront, remains on display at the Knightsbridge mall in Orchard Road for now.

Some people who found the ad to be lewd and inappropriate for the prominent location wrote to The Straits Times' Forum page last month, urging for it to be taken down.



Ok firstly I find nothing wrong with the advertisement. If so all topless men in Singapore need to be arrested.

Think the authorities in Singapore are over conservative and think we are virgin. Please lah! Secondary and even primary students in Singapore are already having sex.

Not that I am agreeable to it but I urge the authorities to put their priority right.

They should spend more time improving the moral of our youth then go around calling a picture of a topless man to be removed.

Then again the advertisement has been there like months and if I am not wrong, A&F is due to open in December this year so it has only 3 months max for display so why only now that this ASAS is asking it to be removed. Wayang?

The best part is ASAS has no enforcement rights. So why is it going around comment on things if it has no authority? Something does not gel here.

From the internet:

What ASAS does
• Provides advice and guidance when advertisers, advertising agencies and media owners are in doubt over the acceptability of advertisements – particularly before publication. However, ASAS is not intended to be a clearing-house for the approval of all advertising.

• Handles complaints about advertising practices. ASAS is able to rule on disputes between members of the Singapore Advertisers Association, the Association of Accredited Advertising Agents, Advertising Media Owners’ Association of Singapore and the Association of Broadcasters.

• Advises on any advertisement prepared and/or published by persons or companies outside the four Associations, provided that it is brought to the attention of ASAS in accordance with the procedure of lodging a complaint.

• Issues sanctions:
o Withholding advertising space or time from advertisers, and withdrawal of the trading privileges from advertising agencies. Both these sanctions are applied by the media owners.
o Adverse publicity. ASAS has the option of publishing details of the outcome of the investigations, ie. naming those who may have offended against the code. This is particularly so for recalcitrant offenders.


Seem like ASAS are in charge of handling complaints. So I guess that this advertisement may has received a few complaints and ASAS knowing it can’t do nothing about it just have to go public and ask the advertisement to be removed.

Look like another “jia liao bee” authority.

"The word Authority is derived mainly from the Latin word auctoritas, meaning invention, advice, opinion, influence, or command. In English, the word 'authority' can be used to mean power given by the state (in the form of Members of Parliament, Judges, Police Officers, etc.), by academic knowledge of an area (someone can be an authority on a subject). "

Health is Priceless

One in 2 put money and career above health
They ranked other priorities, such as money or their career, above health. -myp
Tue, Sep 27, 2011

About one in two people here rank other priorities, such as money or their career, above health, a survey commissioned by pharmaceutical firm Pfizer and released yesterday showed.

The study had polled 214 people.




50% of these people have their priority all wrong.

To me Health is priceless.

With Health you can live life to the fullest and you don’t need lots of money to enjoy simple things in life.

So what if you are rich but instead are bed- reddened and need a machine to breath for you.

So what if you are going places with you career but you are spending most of your life in the office rather then back home playing with your kids or travel to see the world.

This just remind me of the china teenager who sold one of his kidney for a I-pad2 and I-phone 4.

Sad.

Screwed up MRT

Train fault caused 8.5-minute delay at peak hour
Sep 24, 2011

SINGAPORE - A train fault caused an 8-and-a-half minute delay for passengers at peak hour yesterday evening reported the Straits Times today.

The report said about 2,880 passengers were affected by the delay on the East-West line towards Pasir Ris that happened around 7.25pm last night.

An SMRT spokesman said passengers on an east-bound train were asked to alight at City Hall MRT station due to a train fault.

To minimise disruption, passengers on a west-bound train were asked to alight at Bugis MRT station so the train could turn around and serve east-bound passengers, the spokesman added.



SMRT must explain exactly what when wrong and the passenger are to be compensated.
The hint for the fault actually begun much earlier.

I happened to be at Pasir Ris at about 6.50pm and I waited about 10min for the train during peak hour. When I arrived at the platform, there were like already lots of people so I don’t even know how long have the waited.

As usual the train was really packed when it left the station. I have to literally squeeze my way out when I reach Outram Park Station.

So much for world class transport system.

Mark Up - Improving Self Worth

Currently I am busy doing UAT(User Acceptance Test) for a new software system in my company.

Initially my company sourced for consultant to develop this software and lowest quote they got was like $1Million!

So being a ‘prudent’ company, we told the consultant to go fly kite and got one of our own engineer to do it.

With some external help he managed to develop the system at with a budget of about $10,000.

To me he did a good job! His system work and look great too.

Then it got me thinking, how much profit the consultants tried to mark up.

Ok even minus the fee and overhead, we are looking at a different of $980,000! Branding?

My thought then brings me back to the Singapore Armed Forces.

We all know when we lost of damage some equipment in the Army we have to pay for it. (Yes we have to!) But we also know how ridiculously expensive they are.

I remember once we damaged a rotating light and the cost per unit according to SAF is $400! In the end we got one which is exactly the same from a commercial store at $70.

So is SAF also trying to earn profit by making up their equipment cost to cover loses somewhere else or is it just plain inefficient.

If you look carefully, there are several marked up activities happening around you.

Take you monthly conservancy fee. How many percent of it actually go into maintaining your estate?

Gosh these blood-sucking town councils can even invest your money by over collecting.

Finally we have the mother of all marked up, The Singapore’s cabinets.

These jokers’ performances are nothing to shout about in recent years and yet the command obscene salaries.

We are constantly threatened about the end of the world for us if we don’t pay for top talent and ends up with incompetent leaders.

Strangely live still goes on for us with these idiots around for so many years; I don’t see the end of the world yet.

Most if not all retired minister ends up working for the government. I doubt they can command the salaries they claim they are worth in the commercial world.

We don't trust the Men In White

1 in 3 S'poreans are 'cynics'
Sep 15, 2011

SINGAPORE - A new study has found that about a third of Singaporeans are "cynics" - deemed as those who do not trust politicians. The survey, conducted by the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS), covered 1,092 Singaporeans, aged 21 and above, and was conducted about nine months before May's General Election.

The study's definition of cynics include people thinking they are often manipulated by politicians. However, the study did not differentiate whether the politician is from the ruling or opposition parties.

Compared to other liberal democracies like the United States - which sees a higher percentage of cynics of between 47 and 73 per cent - researchers say the 30 per cent figure for Singapore is not huge.

Still, they say the data gives politicians food for thought. IPS deputy director Arun Mahizhan, who noted "some disaffection with the delivery of public goods" such as transport and housing, wondered whether these are "permanent features". He added:"To what extent are these immediate reactions? This is yet to be determined. But this survey suggests that there is a significant minority who are cynical and there are ways in which the cynicism could be addressed."

Liberals are seen to be more cynical, but the study also found that there is no significant relation between a cynic and his income or education levels. It says the difference is not a socio-economic one but a political one, which means cynics in Singapore cut across the entire section of the community.

Cynics in Singapore are also not influenced by mainstream media. Rather, 12.8 per cent get their news from alternative new media sites. So experts say policymakers should exploit the Internet and new media in their engagement efforts, on top of deepening relations both online and offline.

"We need to encourage inter-personal discussions directly between politicians and citizens," said Dr Zhang Weiyu, an Assistant Professor at the Department of Communications and New Media at the National University of Singapore. "So it's not just politicians trying to send their message through mass media to the citizens because we find that inter-personal talk has a big influence on your political psychology."

The study though, also showed that mainstream media, including those online and offline, complement alternative new media sites. For example, 72 per cent turn to television for news, while 71.6 per cent read the newspapers for their main source of information.

Another group that needs to be engaged further are those who claim they do not consume any news, be it through traditional or alternative media sources.

They constitute about 14 per cent of respondents.




I am quite surprise that only 1/3 of us are cynical, I was expecting at least ½ but again the date could be manipulated after all it’s the Straits Time.

Actually the survey does not reveal things that we don’t already know.

Of cause cynical person use alternative media for news as all of us know by now that SPH has always been used by the PAP to their own advantages and the same goes for TCS.

The fact is Reporter without Border rank Singapore 136 for press freedom along side with Mexico, Turkey and Ethiopia. Gosh even Cong and Uganda is better then us!

Note the press try to help the PAP by highlighting that the survey did no differential which party the politicians are from who people feel cynical towards.

Well if you have 81 PAP members and 6 WP members in the parliaments then I would say PAP get 93% of the cynics’ votes.

The survey also claims that 71% of get their news from the mainstream media trying to justify the existence of them?

May I ask how many people believe what is written in the newspaper in Singapore?

To me Politician has a lot to do beside wearing whites and counting their millions to win the heard of Singaporean.

Dumb move of the year.

Wong Kan Seng to be special advisor for Economic Co-operation
PM Lee has appointed Mr Wong Kan Seng as special advisor for Economic Co-operation to the Prime Minister.
Mon, Sep 12, 2011

SINGAPORE -Mr Wong Kan Seng has been appointed as a Special Advisor for Economic Co-operation to the Prime Minister.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong appointed Mr Wong to advise him on Singapore's economic co-operation programmes with China and other Asian countries.
In a related announcement, the former Deputy Prime Minister will be made chairman of Sinbridge from Oct 1.

He will take over from former Cabinet minister Lim Chee Onn; Sinbridge is wholly owned by Temasek Holdings.

Mr Wong Kan Seng has been the MP for the Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC since 2007, he also held the portfolios of Minister for Foreign Affairs from 1991-1994 and Minister for Home Affairs from 1994 to 2010.



I am speechless.

Hsien Loong is doing himself no favour by keeping such loser around.

Looking forward to Election 2016.

Talk is always easy.

S'pore needs more informal occasions for family bonding: President Tony Tan
11 September 2011

President Tony Tan Keng Yam says Singapore needs to create more informal occasions for multi-racial and multi-generational family bonding.

President Tan said this to reporters at the Singapore Zoo on Sunday evening where he attended the "Moon Night" celebrations for the Mid-Autumn Festival.

The festival is an occasion for family and friends to gather and admire the harvest moon.

With a host of educational activities about the moon's effect on animal behaviour, the event also raised awareness about biodiversity and nature conservation.

As part of the programme, President Tan released fireflies into the Zoo's mangroves, as part of ongoing efforts to reintroduce the insect into Singapore's mangroves.

He said: "I don't think wildlife is a charity but it's an attraction. I think it's something which is well worth supporting. And of course I'll be very happy to help the Wildlife Reserves in their effort to attract more corporate sponsorship from companies. Not only the Zoo of course, but the Night Safari, and of course the Bird Park. I think all of these are wonderful amenities for Singaporeans."



Tony is correct to say that family bonding is important and there is a need to create more occasions for it.

But he did not mentioned how to achieve it. Talk is always easy.

With a high standard of living, Singaporeans are hard at works putting in longer and longer hours to make ends meet. We have become slaves for the Nation, a digit and contribute to the annual GDP.

Many don’t even have time to make babies; those which do don’t even have time for them. They just leave them to the maids.

The build on family bond, the government has to look at more concrete measure.

Lower the cost of living, have a pro-family work environments, have more public holiday or even have a 4 and a half days working week.

Singapore has one of the lowest numbers of annual public holiday in the region. 11 days.

While in Hong Kong they have 17 days, Indonesia and Malaysia have 19 days, even Brunei have 14 days.

The question is does our government really want to scarify some economic growth for a more family orientated environment? I doubt so. How can they afford the millions dollars pay cheques to the cabinet if so.

Talk is easy my friend.

PAP is good at self delusion

PM Lee: PAP needs to sharpen its skills
Mr Lee added that the party needs to "sharpen its skills" to listen actively.
Fri, Sep 09, 2011

THE People's Action Party (PAP) needs to adjust its policies to serve people better and improve its engagement and outreach on issues affecting Singaporeans, said Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.

This is despite the strong mandate won by the party in the recent General Election in which it won 81 out of 87 seats and 60.1 per cent of the popular vote.

Making these remarks in the latest issue of Petir, the party's magazine, he said that younger Singaporeans have different life experiences, outlooks and aspirations.

"We must earn their trust by respecting their views, supporting them in their quest to realise their hopes and dreams."

Mr Lee added that the party needs to "sharpen its skills" to listen actively, to build support for policies, to anticipate and counter attempts to score political points by those who do not want the PAP to succeed, and to gain recognition for the Government's good work.




I can’t believe PAP still does not get it after 2 poor election performances.

No wonder, they still think willing 60.1% of the vote is a strong mandates. Gosh this is like a B4 in GCE O Level.

To win people hearts you just have to shut up, listen and show genuine concern for the people. Shutting yourself up in your ivory towers and drawing millions is not helping.

Oh please do more the listen as well. Else it will just become another talk for the sake of talking and listen without action. This is will ensure your votes going southward in the next election.

Easy solution that don't deserve million dollars pay checks.

Low fertility rate, no in-migration will lead to S'pore's population decline
07 September 2011

SINGAPORE: Singapore's resident population will decline and become extremely aged if the Total Fertility Rate (TFR) is extremely low and if there is no in-migration.

This is according to a landmark study on future population growth and change for Singapore published on Wednesday by the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS).

The IPS study started in 2007 worked with different scenarios - of constant low fertility with no immigrants, with 30,000 immigrants and 60,000 immigrants.

The study says with TFR at 1.24 births per woman and zero net migration, Singapore's population will decline to 3.03 million in 2050.

With 30,000 migrants added annually, the population projection is 4.89 million in 2050.

And with 60,000 migrants added annually, population projection is 6.76 million in 2050.

The study also looked at a situation where TFR can be raised to 1.85 births per woman by 2025 with no new immigration.

With such a scenario, the study says population size can still only hit 3.37 million in 2050.

If fertility rate remains low, the study also projected that there will be fewer young people in Singapore.

The number of young people under 14 years of age will go down by more than half from 699,000 in 2005 to 274,400 by 2050.




This report has no value. It is just another piece of propaganda by the incumbent to strike fear by announcing our population will be extremely aged if there is no migrants.

So what if its so?

Economy slowing down? Less progress?

I would gladly give these up for a better quality of life.

We were at 2 millions before and we did quite well.

So who is getting the benefit from the influx of migrant? The government no doubt.

Wealth is not equally distributed in this country. The government and elites only want you and me to work long hours, squeeze into smaller buses and train so to generate more profit for them.

If we are facing ageing problem, the government should look into the root cause.

They should ask themselves why we are not producing but instead they choose to do the easy way by letting in migrant. Don’t forget they age as well and will contribute to the ageing population in the future. So what to do then? Let in more migrants?

This is a good example of overpaid idiots doing a crab job and they still dare to talk about unity.

Smoke screen by PAP

Lee Kuan Yew cautions against turning political divide into national divide
05 September 2011

SINGAPORE: Singapore's former Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew has cautioned Singaporeans against turning the current political divide into a national divide.

He said Singapore could achieve high income growth as compared with its neighbours because during its independence, it had an undivided society that was solidly behind a meritocratic system.

Mr Lee was speaking to 1,800 students at a dialogue session at the Nanyang Technological University on Monday evening. The dialogue - also attended by Education Minister Heng Swee Keat - is part of the annual ministerial forum series organised by the NTU Students' Union.

During the dialogue, Mr Lee acknowledged that the one thing which will change in Singapore and which has already happened is the political divide.

He said as long as the political divide does not degenerate into a national divide, it will not have much impact on the growth of the country.

But Mr Lee warned that if the political divide turned into constant bickering, like what is happening between the Democrats and Republicans in the United States, then Singapore will become just "another ordinary country".

Mr Lee also explained that as Singapore grows more segmented with more diverse educational levels, the country will not have the same homogeneous mass of people to rally behind a single policy.

He said: "What's good for the middle income will be seen by the lower income as unfavourable to them. What is good for the higher income will be resisted by the middle income.

"It is a different society that we face and, therefore, the political leaders will have a much more complicated job of getting the society as a whole to accept a programme which is segmented to meet the needs of various stratas of society."

Another subject of concern during the dialogue was Singapore's immigration policy.

Mr Lee emphasised that a major worry for Singapore's leaders is the fast ageing population, coupled with a drop in fertility rates. Last year, the total fertility rate was at an all-time low of 1.15.

He said: "The birth rate today, the fertility rate, is 1.01. In other words, for every couple, you have 1.01 babies.

"Having said that, the Institute of Policy Studies have the grim statistics of 60,000 migrants a year to keep our economy young. We can't digest that. 20,000 maybe, 25,000 - that's a stretch - but certainly not 60,000."
Mr Lee said the answer is to get couples to have a fertility rate of 1.8 babies or better still, 2.1 babies. Then the population can replace itself.

Mr Lee was also asked about the impact of the recent handing over of the KTM Railway land to Singapore. He said it will benefit ties between the Republic and Malaysia.

Turning to the future, the founding father of modern Singapore stressed that his worry is whether Singaporeans will have the best people in the best jobs.

He said: "My worry about the future is whether we'll have the same national solidarity, the same desire to increase education levels and increase performance and having the best people in the best jobs or holding the most important jobs. Once we veer away from that meritocratic system, our performance will drop."

Political divide will turn into National divide if the incumbent political party are attracting only the ELITES which policies does not benefit the poor and middle income of the nation population.

If you look at PAP, their initial policy in the 60s are good, they generally improve the life of most Singaporean then. However it has since lost it main focus and is working for the benefit of it own rather then for Singapore.

Look at the recent People Association saga. PAP is using tax payer money to champion the party goal rather then the goal of Singaporean.

Look at how PAP treats the Singaporean living in opposition wards.

For many years the PAP itself is splitting the Nation by the way they work in Hougang and Potong Pasir.

I totally disagreed with the old man’s statement:

"What's good for the middle income will be seen by the lower income as unfavourable to them. What is good for the higher income will be resisted by the middle income.”

Bullshit!

Lower the standard of living, lower medical cost, shorten working hours and have a pro-family national policy.

This will benefit all Singaporean and even solve your ageing population problem altogether.
And we are not a true meritocratic society my friend.

May I remind you of Tin Pei Ling. I am sure Tan Chee Say can do a better job then her in parliament.

Father's life is good, it will too be for son.

Dr Yaacob Ibrahim's son will serve NS
His press secretary confirmed on Monday that the minister's son will serve NS.
Tue, Sep 06, 2011

SINGAPORE - Dr Yaacob Ibrahim, the Minister for Information, Communication and the Arts, has refuted online speculation that his son will not serve National Service (NS).

Dr Yaacob's 16-year-old son carries dual citizenship in Singapore and the United States. He was issued US citizenship as his mother is an American citizen by birth.

The issue of his son's citizenship was made public when a leaked US diplomatic cable published by WikiLeaks identified the minister's two children as US citizens.

It then made its way into online forums where some netizens speculated that Dr Yaacob's son will not serve NS. Other netizens called for Dr Yaacob to clarify the matter.

Dr Yaacob's press secretary confirmed yesterday that the minister's son will serve NS just as his father did.

Seem like Yaacob is fast becoming the Minister of the month after Vivian in May.

Well I agreed with him this time that people should leave his private life out of the picture as “innocent” teenager has been targeted because daddy is not very popular.

However we should also asked ourselves why there are so much critics and why are Singaporean has so much dissent towards the Elites and PAP?

It is because the Elites has been abusing their power, pulling string and get their relative into favourable positions.

I believe Yaccob’s son will serve his NS and take up Singapore citizenship in the first place.

Hey why not since Daddy is a demi-god in this country and your place in university and the government sectors are all secured!

Lift is good here! While back in US where you are just a nobody.

Then again I am sure Yaccob’s son name is already on MINDEF white horse list.

I bet he will have a great time serving his nation, becoming either an officer, clerk with a 9-5 job or maybe a sergeant working as a defence scientist!

Unity = You suffer I enjoy.

President Tan calls for unity
He urged that we must now move forward together as one people and one nation. -myp
Fri, Sep 02, 2011

NEWLY sworn-in President Tony Tan appealed yesterday to Singaporeans of different political views to be united, and promised to be a unifying figure for the country.

"Whatever your political views, whatever your station in life, I will strive to the best of my abilities to represent you," he said.

The former deputy prime minister was addressing the 220-strong audience, which included Singapore's founding father, Mr Lee Kuan Yew, at his swearing-in ceremony.

Dr Tan, 71, was elected to the office with a 35.2 per cent mandate - just 0.34 percentage points ahead of election runner-up Tan Cheng Bock.

He took his oath with Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Chief Justice Chan Sek Keong by his side. Prior to the ceremony, a farewell parade was held for former president S R Nathan.

In his first speech made as Singapore's seventh President - and the third elected to the office - he said that he is "humbled" and "honoured" by the presidency. Calling it the "most challenging appointment in (his) three decades of public service", he pledged to apply himself to his tasks "with all my ability, with all my energy, and with all my heart".

He also said that the office of the President is a symbol to embody all that is good in Singapore and its people.

He reassured Singaporeans that he would strive to strengthen the common bonds of the society "regardless of race, language, or religion".

He noted the recent calls for unity, including those made by other candidates, such as Dr Tan Cheng Bock.
"We must now move forward together as one people and one nation. This is vital for our stability and prosperity," he said.

And as Singaporeans did in 1965, President Tan said that Singaporeans "need to come together as one people to face challenges with confidence and build our future together".

His call for unity was echoed by PM Lee in his speech yesterday.

Mr Lee acknowledged that society is changing and politics here will evolve.

This change, said Mr Lee, is "natural and necessary" to respond to the changing social conditions and aspirations of the younger generation.

He said: "These social and political changes manifested themselves in the recent General and Presidential elections."

The debates during the Presidential Election were intense and "even divisive", he said.
"But now, both elections are over and voters have decided. We need to come together again and move forward," added Mr Lee.

He said that President Tan has an important contribution to make in promoting national unity.
"You are a symbol of our unity and nationhood," he said.

Even though this representation is sometimes described as "ceremonial", Mr Lee pointed out that they are "serious and important" ones, especially in times of uncertainty.

Speaking to reporters after the ceremony, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen also stressed the need for unity in the country.

He said: "The purpose of the elections is to elect leaders to take us forward. Having done that, we must all be focused on moving ahead."

On the new President, he said: "I worked with him for many years. I am sure he will be - in his own words - a president we can all be proud of."



For once I agreed with Tony. Unity.

But how to achieve this?

To these PAP idiots and Elites, Unity is for you to scarify your pays and lifestyle so they can enjoy theirs.

Not once did I see the PAP nor Elites reach out to the people, they still refuse to step down from their ivory towers, not open to suggestion and critics .Damned! They are not even willing to take a pay cut for UNITY SAKES.

Look at the recent People Association Fiasco.

PA is behaving like a gangster who use tax payer money to act as a political tools for the PAP.
Finger to you man!

Best still openly admit it. Arrogant or stupid? Look like more votes down the drawn Hsien Loong.

Oath of Office of President of Singapore

I hope Tony will meant what he will be saying for the next 6 years.

The Oath:

"I,(name), having been elected President of the Republic of Singapore, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully discharge my duties as such to the best of my ability without fear or favour, affection or ill-will, and without regard to any previous affiliation with any political party, and that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Republic, and that I will preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore."

Amazing words from a PAP Minister.

Minister Yaacob Ibrahim also congratulates Dr Tony Tan on behalf of Muslim community
04:46 AM Aug 31, 2011

SINGAPORE - The results of the recently-concluded Presidential Election showed there was "strong support" for the ruling People's Action Party, even though voters were divided between two "very good" candidates in the form of former Deputy Prime Minister Tony Tan and former Ayer Rajah Member of Parliament Tan Cheng Bock.

This was the view of Minister for Information, Communications and the Arts Yaacob Ibrahim, who was speaking to reporters yesterday after attending morning Hari Raya prayers at the Assyafaah Mosque.

Dr Yaacob, who is also Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affairs, congratulated President-elect Tony Tan on behalf of the Muslim community.

Adding that Dr Tony Tan has done a lot for the Muslim community, Dr Yaacob noted that Dr Tony Tan was at Assyafaah Mosque some years back - following 911 - "trying to reach out to the Muslim community, trying to explain what is it we can do together with the country, with the nation, to strengthen social cohesion."

Dr Yaacob disagreed with suggestions that Dr Tony Tan's razor-thin winning margin of 0.34 per cent reflected a political divide among Singaporeans.

Pointing out that the combined vote share for Dr Tony Tan and Dr Tan Cheng Bock - both former PAP MPs - was about 70 per cent, Dr Yaacob said:

"There's strong support for the party in that sense. But it's clear that there are people who are divided, as explained by the Prime Minister, (who) were basically having to decide between two very good candidates."

In a press statement issued after the official results were announced on Sunday, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong noted that voters "faced a difficult choice between Dr Tony Tan and Dr Tan Cheng Bock".

Mr Lee had added: "This explains why the winning margin is so narrow, and why the winner only gained slightly more than one-third of the total votes. Nevertheless, under our first-past-the-post system, the election has produced an unambiguous winner, who has the mandate to be the next President."

Dr Yaacob said the process of electing Singapore's seventh President reflects a maturing democracy, "that we're able to agree to disagree".

He added: "But most important thing is, as the Prime Minister has said, now we have to move forward and build the nation together."

Speaking to reporters at the Istana's Hari Raya Puasa open house yesterday, outgoing President S R Nathan - who will step down from office today - described Dr Tony Tan as "a highly capable person, very approachable, a person who carries himself well". Mr Nathan said: "I'm sure he will be a great asset and the pride of Singapore... I'm sure he's got the experience and the ability to deal with it."



I try to refrain from writing about the PE2011 since the result is heart wrecking and I more or less have moved on but the papers keep printing boot licking articles praising Tony’s amazing win is really too much for me to swallow.

Now Yacob is thinking we are as stupid as him and is trying to score points for PAP.

In the first place the presidential election is not supposed to be political and the candidates cannot be from any political parties and should be non partisan.

Yacob now trying to add politic into this election result thinking Singaporean are stupid by basically is adding up the 2 formal PAP’s members votes and claiming victory for the incumbent.

This has brought the art of self denial to a whole new level. Amazing!

The fact about PE2011 is Tony had won, scraping through by winning 35% of the votes.

He has won but majority of Singaporean did not want him to be the President of Singapore.

This is the hard truth.

The invasion

I took the bus home last week. It was later then usual and I happened to be awake on the journey home.

I suddenly had a feeling that I was in a foreign land.

On the bus there were about 40% Singaporean, 40% Filipinos, 10% Chinese National and 10% Indians.

I guess most Singaporean drive these days and now I know why no one bothers about the standard of public transports these days.

I counted at one bus stop there were 20 Filipinos who got off and zero Singaporean.

Everywhere I go I see people from All over the world that come to Singapore to suck it dry. They Foreigners are here, without servicing NS, to compete with Singaporean for Job, Seats on Bus, Seats at hawkers etc etc.

The elites who run this country are still living in their ivory towers.

I wonder how many Foreigners does PM or the President bump into daily in their sheltered world.

Cooling off Day thought.

On the eve of the Singapore Presidential Election, I share a quote for the man who had set the standard.

“Some people still ask whether my long previous association with the PAP will stop me from acting independently. The answer is no. My loyalty is first and foremost, to the people of Singapore. It has always been so, and will always remain so”

Ong Teng Cheong, August 1993

此地无银三百两. (There is no 300 tales of silver buried here.... YEAH RIGHT!)

Tony Tan's sons refute online allegations on NS record
By Zakir Hussain

Dr Tony Tan's three sons - Peter, Patrick and Philip - have described as 'lies' allegations concerning their National Service that have been circulating on the Internet and reinforced by their father's opponents over the past few days.

In a statement early this morning, they said: 'Our reputations and the institution of National Service have been maligned, simply to attack our father, Dr Tony Tan.

'We fulfilled all obligations in accordance with the rules, regulations, and deployment policies of Mindef (the Ministry of Defence)'.

They also said: 'Like all other Singaporeans, we are proud to have served Singapore during our National Service'.

Dr Tan's sons, aged 45, 42 and 35, have been the subject of insinuations that they were given special treatment during their NS stints even though they were combat-fit.

Dr Tan was defence minister between 1995 and 2003.

These claims were also alluded to by speakers at the rallies of Mr Tan Jee Say and Mr Tan Kin Lian on Tuesday and Wednesday night respectively.

Last month, Dr Tony Tan described as 'false rumours' online talk that he helped his son Patrick avoid NS by arranging for him to do medical research work.

He said then that all three of his sons had served their NS fully and he never intervened in their postings, and that he was 'deeply disappointed' by these online allegations.


Then just give us the raw facts and the people of Singapore can decide whether you are lying or not.

Look like a desperate attempt to save Daddy.

Can the Peter, Patrick and Philip tell us what is their PES Status in NS and what is their rank and vocations during NS and when is their enrolment dates, disruption dates and ROD’s dates?

And tell us beside them who else hold these special vocations if so.

Also tell us how many in-camp cycles did they gone through please.

Tony doesn’t have to intervene in his sons posting. His Generals had done it for him. Can Tony say none of his son’s superior during NS time knew they were his son?

If you are an aspiring Officer in the army and will you screw your Boss’s sons or will you choose to treat them super nice so that your rice bowl will not be jeopardised?

The answer is obvious my friends.

Gosh Tony is digging his own grave here. We all know there are always some special treatments for white horses in NS and accepted it as a way of life. So please stope treating us as idiot and try to lie, it makes me sick!

I have served NS and seen enough.

Note some people never serve also became MP. So Tony why you so worry Singapore get to know your sons got special treaments in NS?

PA and HDB shows PAP's true colour

MND, PA on leasing sites on HDB land in Aljunied
They explained in joint statement the reasons behind leasing 26 sites on HDB land within Aljunied town.
Wed, Aug 24, 2011

The Ministry of National Development (MND) and the People's Association (PA) explained in a joint media statement the reasons behind leasing 26 sites on Housing & Development Board (HDB) land within Aljunied town.

The following is the joint statement.

At the request of the PA in May, the HDB has leased 26 sites on HDB land within the Aljunied Town, to PA for them to organise community activities.

Such requests are not unusual. From time to time, HDB has received similar requests from other Government agencies or civic organisations, including religious bodies. Where they are legitimate, HDB has approved such tenancy requests.

In this instance, PA has explained to HDB the reasons for their request. First, PA has been using such sites frequently to conduct community activities.

PA intends to continue organising such activities in order to carry out their mission of promoting bonding among the residents.

Second, PA has had no difficulty getting access to sites managed by the PAP Town Councils. However in Hougang, PA and the local grassroots organisations have had many difficulties getting access to Town Council sites.

PA was concerned that they might encounter similar difficulties in Aljunied. To avoid unproductive wrangling, PA decided that it would be best if they could lease their own sites.

PA has further assured the HDB that they would ensure that their leased sites would be fully open to all residents so long as the activities were non-political in nature.

HDB had carefully assessed the request and approved it. The Aljunied Town has many open areas. In approving the request from PA, HDB has ensured that there will be sufficient open areas to meet the demand from other users.

Indeed, there have been occasions when organisers of grassroots and community events applied to use sites managed by Aljunied-Hougang Town Council (AHTC), and were told that they were expected to invite the local MP.

It was only on August 19, 2011, that the Chairman of AHTC stated publicly that the town council would not impose any condition on whom the organisers could invite, when using sites managed by AHTC.

PA welcomes this new position of AHTC, and is likewise lifting its current restriction on invitees for events organised by non-GROs on sites leased by PA from HDB, as long as they are of a non-political nature



More on Worker Party’s ELECTED MP being unfairly treated by HDB and PA.

MND and PA issued a press statement trying to justify what they did. Gosh even the loser PAP Desmond had a mini press conference complaining he had difficulties securing venue for his God’s know what even using God’s know whose money in Hougang.

Loser Desmond is not even ELECTED, he is just like you and me, ordinary Singaporean who is serving his master more then the people of Hougang.

PA should states incident on all occasion when and where did they failed to access to Hougang Town Council Sites. They may be already booked for other events in the first place! Idiot!

Stupid PA even slap itself in the face by justify its action of taking over sites in Aljunied so to prevent “unproductive wrangling”.

Stupid HDB shoot itself in the head by handling over these sites without telling anyone. Now they are indeed in deep shit for siding with PA.

Moreover why suddenly PA want to take over sites in Aljunied only? Are you sure only this Town Council is “unproductive”? In fact to be fair you should take over all sites in Singapore and manage them yourself till you faint.

Now who say PA is for Singapore. Just look at who are on the board.

Try to score some point for Tony but scored own goal.

The man whose passion is Singapore
Aug 23, 2011
by Teo Xuanwei

Former Deputy Prime Minister Tony Tan gave an almost embarrassed chuckle when this reporter asked whether his old Casio watch - which he has kept for over 30 years - or his battered wallet - from which he fished out S$5 for a street busker - were signs of him being sentimental or frugal.

"It works well, so I don't see any point changing it. I don't believe in changing things so long as they work. I use it until it sort of falls apart," explained Dr Tan, in his trademark matter-of-fact manner.

Dressed casually in slacks and New Balance track shoes, Dr Tan has been meeting Singaporeans from all walks of life and all races, shaking hundreds of hands a day.

Despite being stopped every few steps by Singaporeans wanting to snap a picture with him, the 71-year-old kept up a pace that this 20-something reporter found challenging to keep up with.

Dr Tan's schedule thus far has comprised four to five events each day, starting as early as 8am and ending only at 11pm after a nightly review at his campaign headquarters.

How has he managed to stay in tip-top shape amid a gruelling campaign?
His secret, he says, is his wife.

"My wife looks after me very well. She makes me a lot of chicken soup," he said.

Also his exercise regime of daily 3km jogs, swims and gym workouts is "no longer a matter of enhancement but a matter of maintenance". He added: "I don't think one can (contest the Presidential Elections) half-heartedly. Once you decide to do it, you must be prepared to cover the ground."

When asked about his passion in life, Dr Tan replied without hesitation: "Singapore."

A topic he spoke readily about at length and with passion, sharing his views on a variety of topics such as the complex challenges facing the nation, or the painstaking efforts that went into building the unique socio-political situation that the Singapore society finds itself in.

But when it came to more personal questions - including those about his family - Dr Tan was more circumspect.

"I try to keep the privacy of my family as much as possible," said Dr Tan, who has been a public figure for several decades, after he was elected as a Member of Parliament for Sembawang in 1979 in a by-election. While he retired from politics in 2006, Dr Tan remained in the public eye in his positions at Government organisations such as the National Research Foundation.

Nevertheless, Dr Tan shared with this reporter the three guiding principles of his life: Honesty, having the right motivation to do things and determination.
He said: "One has to be frank and open about what he wants to do and why he wants to do it ... When you set your mind to do something, you must have the determination to see it through."

During his Presidential candidate broadcast speech last week, Dr Tan shared that he met his wife, Mary, at university. But they could not hold their wedding dinner because of curfews imposed after the deadly riots in 1964. He added in his speech that the couple celebrated their 47th wedding anniversary this month "with our four children, their spouses and five grandchildren".

Towards the end of the interview, this reporter asked his wife what attracted her to him. At this point, Dr Tan turned to his wife and asked, with a hint of child-like nervousness: "Do you want to answer that?" They laughed a little, and then apologised, saying they had to continue their walkabout in Jurong Point shopping mall.

But as Dr Tan turned and started walking away, Mrs Tan whispered: "He's always been a gentleman."


Oh please spare me for trying to portray Tony as Frugal just because of his wallet and watch. Please ask him how many Mercedes he owned and where is he staying now.

Oh and also asked him how much of our money in GIC did he lose. Frugal my….

In fact Tony has reviewed that he doesn’t believe in changes as along as it works. Mmm… so guess he will be Nathan No.2 if he is elected.

No change no even for the better, lazy if you ask me.

Vote wisely fellow Singaporean.

No change = More Foreigners, Same PAP jokers in Cabinets, Same CPF limits, Same housing problem, Same Transport problem oh but different President’s and Cabinet salaries.

Hsien Loon say one thing but do another.

On Straits Time Online front page today.

Note the 1st and Last Headlines.

Isn't this ironic?

Yes work together for you I guess.

PAP dirty politic

Chen Show Mao banned from attending 7th month dinners with residents by Paya Lebar CCC
Temasek Review

Workers’ Party MP Chen Show Mao has been banned from attending Seventh Month dinners in his Paya Lebar division of Aljunied GRC by the Paya Lebar CCC (Citizens’ Consultative Committee is under the People’s Association)!

The Seventh Month dinners are organized yearly in Singapore during the Seventh month of the Chinese Lunar calender to celebrate the ‘Hungry Ghost Festival’. They are usually held in open fields and courts which are under the purview of the People’s Association.

In a note posted on his Facebook yesterday, Mr Chen wrote that the organizers were not allowed to use venues in their neighborhood if they invite their MP to the event.

“The last such dinner I was scheduled to attend took place last week, a few weeks after the organizers called to let me know that they could no longer have me show up at the event as they had originally hoped. The organizers as in previous years had planned to hold the festivities on a hard court in the HDB estate, but this year were told by the Paya Lebar CCC that, as a condition for receiving CCC approval to use the venue, they may no longer invite their MP to the event. Future approvals will be withheld from errant organizers.”

However according to one Aljunied resident, ex-Aljunied MP Cynthia Phua had attended such dinners during her term as PAP MP in the last ten years and there was never any issue with the CCC.

One Aljunied resident Wilson Pang whose father is a member of the Seventh Month Organising Committee for the Blk 18 Hougang Ave 3 first highlighted the matter to Mr Chen on his Facebook two weeks ago:

“While applying for the permit this year, they were informed by the PA that they will only be allowed to use the open space if opposition MPs did not participate in any of the activities. Mdm Cynthia Phua, as MP for the ward, has always participated in the celebrations and been present at the dinners in previous years.”

“It pains me that they felt so embarrassed to pass me the news. Regrettably, this is not the first time it has happened since I was elected,” he added.

In contrast, PAP MP Tin Pei Ling attended a 7th month dinner in Aljunied Crescent (under Marine Parade GRC) last night and even made a speech on stage.

Ms Tin also attended a 7th month dinner in MacPherson on 11 August 2011:
Why are PAP MPs allowed to attend 7th month dinners to mingle around with their residents but not non-PAP MPs? How are they supposed to perform their duties as MPs if they are not given the opportunity to know their residents better?

The People’s Association is supposedly a statutory board funded by taxpayers’ monies, but has been ‘converted’ to become the PAP’s de facto ‘grassroots’ branch over the years.

CCCs, CCs and RCs are usually led by PAP branch secretaries and members. In the case of Aljunied GRC, losing PAP MP Ong Ye Kung was appointed as an ‘adviser’ of its grassroots organizations though Aljunied voters had clearly rejected him in the May election.

Speaking to a delegation of visiting Chinese officials two years ago, PAP supreme leader Lee Kuan Yew boasted that “all CCCs, CCs and RCs are part of the PAP.”

While Aljunied residents are not allowed to invite their elected MPs to grace their 7th month dinners, RC boards are allowed to hang banners of PAP-endorsed presidential candidate Tony Tan.

With the CCCs, CCs and RCs under the iron-fisted control of the totalitarian PAP regime, it will be an impossible task for Singaporeans to vote the PAP out of office via the ballot box in the future especially with the increasing number of new citizens the PAP is currently recruiting into these “public” organizations funded by taxpayers’ monies.



The incumbent has never failed to amused and disgust me with their unfairness, under the belt shot at their oppositions, their childishness, their arrogant and their total lack of connection with the ground.

Yet again the Men In White are doing themselves harm but making life hard for the Worker Party MPs to work in their wards.

For GOD’s Sake, just let them do their job and be treated with dignity and fairness as may I remind the incumbent that they did win the Votes of the people of Singapore to be in parliament. Not like that MG Chan whatever who piggy backed his way into parliament and has been talking cock since.

OK and thanks for the reminder on how ridiculous Tin Pei Ling is and how amazingly she got away with the cooling off day incident. Now whenever I seen a Kate Spade bag I will have a vision of bimbo Tin with her Kate Spade bad and the V post. (GOSH this is your MP People of Macpherson!)

A person with good integrity and has the heart to server the people of Singapore should be in the parliament of Singapore no matter what political party he or she is from.

These little moves by the PAP is only making the party look worst and lost more vote from Singaporean and I do hope your Tony won’t moving in to Istana despite all the advantages he got.

What the President's candidates symbols meant for me.

I like Tan Jee Say’s symbol. As least he shows he got heart.

Tan Kin Lian make me feel he like to connect to the people in a fun way.

Tan Cheng Bock’s makes me think he is trying to reach out and provide shelter and smart enough as it has his Chinese character of his name.

Tony is just outrightly put himself in the centre of attention, self centre one might say?

4 in the Running

So one of the four Tan will be the next President of Singapore.

If you ask me er.... Tony look a bit weird in this picture from Straits Time.

PAP openly endorse Tony

PE: PM Lee on what Presidential Election is about
16 August 2011

SINGAPORE: Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has said that getting a Certificate of Eligibility to contest the Presidential Election does not necessarily mean that candidates are all "equally qualified to be President".

Four hopefuls have been issued the Certificate of Eligibility. They are Dr Tony Tan, Dr Tan Cheng Bock, Mr Tan Kin Lian and Mr Tan Jee Say.

Mr Lee stressed that his government will work with the man chosen by voters, whoever he is.

The Prime Minister weighed in on the Presidential Election just a day before Nomination Day.

Meeting the local media at the Istana on Tuesday, Mr Lee said he felt the need to speak on the issue not because of what any of the presidential hopefuls has said, but because he felt Singaporeans need to know his views and to give them something to think about when they go to the polls.

Mr Lee reiterated the role and responsibility of the President under the Constitution.

The President has blocking powers in only five areas, such as over the country's reserves and key appointments.

In all other areas, the President must act in accordance with the advice of the Prime Minister and Cabinet.

Mr Lee also took the opportunity to talk about how his government has worked with President S R Nathan.

He cited the example of how the government had drawn on the reserves during the 2008 global financial crisis.

The proposal was put to the President and the Committee of Presidential Advisers.

Mr Lee said: "They asked questions, they spent several days thinking the matter over, asked and finally, only after satisfying themselves that this was in Singapore's best interest and the situation was serious enough to need the draw (on the reserves), that they approved the draw.

"The result was we were able to stabilise the economy, to boost confidence and to recover strongly when the storm passed, but also importantly, we were able to demonstrate how the Presidential safeguards were meant to work and could work in a tight situation."

Mr Lee said it is important for both the government and President to have a mutual understanding and constructive relationship and this is how he hopes to work with the next President.

He added that given the troubled global economic landscape, it is important that Singaporeans choose a capable President who can make well-judged decisions in the country's best interests.

The President also plays an important ceremonial role.

Mr Lee reminded Singaporeans that the President is a unifying figure and he also represents Singapore on the international stage.

For example, Mr Lee said President Nathan's grasp of international relations helped greatly to enhance Singapore's friendly relations with many countries.

Asked if a candidate's association with the ruling People's Action Party could work against him, Mr Lee said "no".

"When he becomes President, then he is in a different role, he's no longer a PAP member and he no longer takes instructions from the party. He's his own man, as Mr Ong Teng Cheong showed when he became President, and I think that is the way it has to work," said Mr Lee.

"Singapore is a very small society, and if you say you want people to come from completely different corners of the world and never had had any connection with one another, and then that counts as being independent, I think that is not possible," added Mr Lee.

Of the four presidential hopefuls, three have links to the PAP. Dr Tony Tan had served as deputy prime minister and Dr Tan Cheng Bock was a former MP, while former NTUC Income chief Tan Kin Lian was a former PAP member.

While Mr Lee did not want to be drawn into commenting what he thinks of the aspirants, he did repeat his endorsement of Dr Tony Tan.

"I think Dr Tony Tan is eminently qualified and a very good candidate. But I leave it to Singapore voters to make their judgement and I have every confidence they will make a good judgement," he said.

If there is a contest on Nomination Day, Singaporeans will go to the polls on August 27 in the country's first Presidential Election in 18 years.



Ah… no PM is adding his 2 cents worth on the President race on the eve on nomination day.
I was questioning his purpose ask he talk on old issue and again emphasis how idiotic PAP think Singaporean are assuming we can’t think for ourselves.

But his true intend for this press conference came at the end. His endorsement for Tony.

So in summary, Hsien Loong is tell you and me that although all 4 president hopeful got the COE but there is one that is more qualify and you know the President is very important one as he er… do….er….hmm… but he has blocking blocking powers in ONLY five area ,such as over the country's reserves and key appointments plus he can have informal talk to air his view privately to Hsien Loong but end of the day he can’t do nothing if the cabinet want something out of his wish.

Hsien Loong then go on about how the President represent Singaporean internationally and he prefer someone with this experience for President. Then he openly supports Tony.

Well Hsien Loong this is only your view.

One man one vote, we are all entitled to vote for someone who will not be a PAP yes man and demand a better Singapore’s society that is really Democratic, have real Justice, as well as Equality, and able to achieve Prosperity and Progress.

The talk cock Banker.

Many clients welcome telemarketing calls, replies bank association
ST Forum 16 Aug 2011

WE THANK Mr Lee Pheng Soon for his feedback ('Bank's reply omitted vital details'; Forum Online, July 26).
From time to time, banks offer new products and services to their customers through telemarketing calls.

Feedback from our member banks reveal that many customers have found such calls beneficial as they serve to inform customers of the new products and services being offered by their banks.

Customers who do not find such telemarketing calls beneficial can request their banks to put them on the do-not-call list. Banks subscribe to the telemarketing guidelines for the financial industry issued by the Contact Centre Association of Singapore (CCAS). Under the telemarketing guidelines, banks are committed to maintain a do-not-call list.

Customers who have requested not to be called by their banks or their telemarketing agents will be put on the do-not-call list. Banks and their telemarketing agents will refrain from making telemarketing calls to such customers.

If customers have feedback on any telemarketing issues, they can e-mail ABS at banks@abs.org.sg and provide details such as the name of the bank/telemarketing agent and the date and time of the call.

ABS will follow up with the relevant bank to ensure that the bank in question adheres to the telemarketing guidelines.

Ong-Ang Ai Boon (Mrs)
Director
The Association of Banks in Singapore



This is the most ridiculous statement by the Association of Banks in Singapore. Well guess this Ang Ai Boon is just trying to save the business she is in.

I have talked to many people and most and if not all find telemarketer are a bunch of pests.

This Ang Ai Boon claims that you can request your bank to put you on the do not call list if you do not want such harassments (Service) but judging from my own experience, I got call from Banks who I totally have no dealing with.

Moreover, these banks sub-contract this telemarketing service to multiple 3rd parties companies who do not follow to the rules. I personally receive caller who refuse to indentify themselves, hang up immediately when I question where they got my contacts and I even received call from different companies representing the same bank in the same day. Heck! I even receive call from company representing Standard Chartered Bank 1 year later after I told them to put me on their DO NO CALL LIST.

So the banks are big corporations like APPLE and NIKE that sub contract their job to 3 parties sweat shop and scum companies so these big corporations on the paper have a clean set of rules but they will claim ignorance of what their sub contractors are doing.

I will appreciate if this Ang Ai Boon can share where the hell did she get the evidence that MOST of the clients welcome telemarketing calls? Else she is just talking for the sake of talking. Dumb.

A thought on NDP rally 2011.

I did not actually sit through the entire speech by PM yesterday as I don’t find him sincere and basically he said the same time last year and last last year and even during his GE speech in May.

He really shows us that PAP has disconnected from the people and ok they are trying to connect back but are too lost or proud to do it properly and therefore came across as insincere.

I read his speech carefully and there are a couple of his points that really bother me.


4. So from personal perspective, many citizens feel pressures in daily lives. They ask themselves:
a. Why has my cost of living gone up?
b. Can I or my children afford to buy homes of our own?
c. What about my healthcare costs when I grow old?
d. In sum: Singa¬pore may be progressing, but can I be part of the success story?
5. Fully understand and empathise with concerns. We are tackling them
a. Building more flats
b. Improving public transport
c. Managing inflow of foreign workers and immigrants
d. Will take a while, but things will get better
e. Please be patient


So why did we end up here? Where cost of living gone up? Why there are flat shortage? Expensive health care and long wait for public Health care? Why we have a screwed up Public Transport system? Why influx of Foreign workers?

I tell you why.

Cost of living is up because of high rental set by the government to feed their greed.

Store or office rental gone up and the retailer has not choice but to sell their product at a higher price to keep themselves in business.

Prices of flats gone up due to shortages as flood gates for Foreigners was opened for many years.

Again this to feed the government’s greed.

More Foreign workers here to drive the labour cost down and therefore more profit for those at the top of the food chain.

Why we ends up today are due to PAP’s flaw policies over the years and PM tried to appease us by kicking the clowns Ministers in charge out of the cabinet. This also proved the paying top dollars does not mean you will get top quality person.

Jobs
47. Even then, slowing down the inflow of foreign workers means accepting lower economic growth
a. Some companies may be deterred from investing or expanding their operations in Singapore, and choose to close-down, move or invest elsewhere
b. Less vibrancy in our economy and society
c. Less resources to improve the lives of Singa¬poreans
d. Fewer opportunities for our people


Putting Singaporean first in the job market is a very sensitive issue as all Singaporean men need to server NS service. (Unless you are some Dr who even ends up as MP for God’s know what reason left the country and skip NS).

I do not agreed that slowing down inflow of foreign wokers means accepting lower economic growth. This is utterly rubbish.

You look at the quality of foreigner in Singapore. Yes there are a few good one but the rest are just crap.

At the lower end they are cheap labour but have no quality.

At the top end they are expensive but also have no quality.
To me you must attract the CORRECT kind of foreigner to help your country grow not any Tom, Dick and Harry there are reject from their own countries that come here as they know we are sucker for foreigners.


The only way for Singapore to grow and be a good place to live in is a drastic change in government policies. If the PAP can’t do it then somebody have to do it.

I will gladly accept a lower pay, slower economy growth for a country with a slower pace, good health care and a wonderful quality of live that enable me to spent time with families, friends and my hobbies.

Till then I will keep a look out for another country beside Singapore.

Will you vote for the Enemy?

PE: 4 get Certificates of Eligibility for presidential polls
11 August 2011

SINGAPORE: The stage is set for a contest not seen in Singapore's history.

Four hopefuls were on Thursday issued eligibility certificates for the Presidential Election on August 27.

The last time there was a contest was in 1993, when the elected presidency was introduced.

The Presidential Elections Committee said it received six applications.

And in assessing the suitability of each hopeful, it was satisfied that Mr Tan Kin Lian, Dr Tony Tan, Dr Tan Cheng Bock and Mr Tan Jee Say are all men of integrity, good character and reputation.

That's one of the criteria for eligibility.

Other criteria include a candidate having served at least three years as a chairman or CEO of a statutory board or company with a paid-up capital of at least S$100 million, or having served in a similar capacity under a special clause.

Dr Tony Tan and Dr Tan Cheng Bock were deemed to have met the first criterion, while Mr Tan Kin Lian and Mr Tan Jee Say qualified under the special clause.

The committee noted that Mr Tan Kin Lian had been the Chief Executive Officer of NTUC Income Insurance Co-operative Limited for more than three years.

The committee said NTUC Income, although a co-operative, had a paid-up capital of more than S$100 million in the years preceding Mr Tan Kin Lian's departure in 2007.

And this is comparable in size and complexity to a company with a paid-up capital of the same amount.

Mr Tan was the NTUC Income CEO from 1977 to 2007.

As for Mr Tan Jee Say, the committee said that as regional managing director of AIB Govett Asia, he had overall responsibility for the company's operations.

He therefore held a position similar to a CEO.

The committee added that AIB Govett Asia is an organisation of equivalent complexity when compared to companies in Singapore with a paid-up capital of
S$100 million.

The two hopefuls who were deemed not eligible are retiree Ooi Boon Ewe and former JTC Corporation Group Chief Financial Officer Andrew Kuan.

The committee said Mr Ooi had submitted an incomplete application form. He had also acknowledged that he did not meet the eligibility criteria.

As for Mr Kuan's second attempt at running for the presidency, the committee maintained that his seniority and responsibility as Group CFO between 2001 and 2004 are not comparable to what have been set out under the Presidential Elections Act.

The committee's decision is final.


So this is it. Four are qualify to submit their name on nomination day next week to try to become the 3rd elected President of Singapore.

To me the elected President has always be a strategic move by the PAP to back them up on their policy. Although they might have miscalculated on the capability of our dear late President Ong.

So the 2nd “elected” President Nathan is pretty much useless in looking after Singaporean interest in the last 12 years and he did not anything to check on the Singapore government nor our reserve yet he still got a fat pay check.

This year we all know that Tony is the PAP endorsed one and the other 3 each has their own agenda for running but I can be sure they have not got the backing from the Men In Whites.

A four corner fights will definitely benefit Tony, so I am worry about this. .It does not help that the other 3 who are not so active until recently. In fact this might be what the PAP want.

You have to say Tony has been in the lime light since his PAP days and is a seasoned politician. (Although he screwed up on the handshake with the fishmonger). And yes he did get some unfair advantage with the media brainwashing tactics used on us.

So who to vote for?

The famous ex-DPM Tony who got the backing from PAP, The Tan Clan, 7 Unions and maybe the Malay business Association?

Tan Kin Lian, Tan Cheng Bock or Tan Jee Say?

Well I just ask you a simple question.

Say you want to hire 2 security guards to look after your billions of cash in a remote island, will you hire the 2nd guard if you know she is the wife of the first one? Or would you rather hire someone neutral so to ensure your interest and not the interest of the 1st security guards are taken care of?

Ask yourself this before going to the poll my fellow Singapoearn.

Now I will wait and see what Tan Kin Lian, Tan Cheng Bock and Tan Jee Say got to say.

Tony? Nah I heard enough.

Satisfaction for public transport had gone up. Yeah right!

Commuters more satisfied with public transport
Customer Satisfaction Index by SMU's Institute of Service Excellence (ISES) saw an increase of 5.3 points for buses and 3.7 points for the MRT.
Thu, Aug 11, 2011

A study by the Singapore Management University (SMU) has shown that communters here are more satisfied with public transport now, compare to a year ago.

Data from a Customer Satisfaction Index by the university's Institute of Service Excellence (ISES) saw an increase in customer satisfaction with public buses, from 61.1 points to 66.4 points.
Satisfaction with the MRT system also rose by 3.7 points to 67.8 points, reported the Straits Times.

ISES academic director Marcus Lee said the data showed that local residents feel they are getting more value out of their bus rides.

This could be due to the implementation of distance-based fares last year, as well as the addition of bus trips, he added.



This propaganda article is published to support the 1% fare hike in pubic transport.

ISES does not help by not reviewing the sample size nor what people did they sampled from.

As I have mentioned before. I can publish a paper using survey from just 3 people and if 2 out of 3 say the transport system is good the I already score a 60 points.

Moreover I can also more or less tweet the result by selecting the people to do my survey.

For example if I want to find out how good the PAP is and if I want to score a positive points, I will select grassroot leaders and high level civil servant to do my survey.

And if I want a negative result, I will select people from Aljunie and Hougang to do my survey.

So these surveys are useless.

And if you ask me on public transport satisfaction, I will give both the buses and MRT operators 1/100 each.

Your sure you want him as President?

President not a separate power centre: Tony Tan

While the elected President can have influence, he "is not — and should not be — a separate power centre," believes presidential hopeful Dr Tony Tan.

What the President can and should do is address the concerns of Singaporeans and take them into account when exercising his or her powers, said Dr Tan.

"These concerns can also be raised formally or informally through appropriate channels. The choice of channels to pursue depends on the individual situation," he said.

Outlining his understanding of the President's role in a statement on Wednesday, he added the President must also have "a heart for all Singaporeans" and know how to reflect their concerns effectively in the context of national and international affairs.

"One can, of course, imagine very different roles for the President that would require a constitutional amendment. But the Presidential Election itself is the wrong forum for this," said Dr Tan.

"Candidates should run for the office that exists, not for the one they wish to have."
His comments come in the midst of an ongoing debate on the role of the highest office in Singapore, most recently stemming from Law Minister K Shanmugam's comments at an Institute of Policy Studies forum.

He said the President "can speak on issues only as authorised by the Cabinet; and he must follow the advice of the Cabinet in the discharge of his duties".

Dr Tan, who attended the IPS forum, said many have pressed him for his thoughts on the issue.
Other Presidential hopefuls have also raised their views. Both Tan Kin Lian and Dr Tan Cheng Bock agreed the President should work within the boundaries of the Constitution.

Tan Kian Lian disagreed, however, that the President could not speak without the Cabinet's approval. He urged the government to "adopt a more open approach towards the issues of the people" and engage the public on their concerns.

Dr Tan Cheng Bock took issue with Minister Shanmugam's comments that the influence a President depends on who the President is. Dr Tan Cheng Bock urged for mutual respect between the government and the President.



Judging from this report, Tony already declare that he will be the president without a mind of his own and will only happily do say what the PAP/Cabinet authorized him to say.

Then may I ask you why we need a $4M guys who do only what the PAP want him to do? We might as well do without the President and saved the $4M and used it to help the poor.

Tony also states that the President must have "a heart for all Singaporeans", yah I wonder when was the last time he took the public transport or eat at a hawker center (Last Sunday newspaper even quote he has his favourite prawn noodle bought for him).

He already shows us what his heart is like with his handshakes with the fishmonger.

So vote wisely my fellow Singaporean. We don’t need a inert $4M man who has no sincerity, do only the what the Men In White does and got away with a white horse son.

I have left the country without a passport.

Venue: Pair ris White Sand Kopitiam
Date: 04th Aug 2010


FT from Philippine: I want meal no. 43 take away.

Store assistant from China: 你要什么？

FT from Philippine: 43 take away 打包.

Store assistant from China to me: 他要三十几？

Me to Store assistant from China: 他要四十三打包。


No thanks from anyone. Next time I will tell the Filipino to learn Chinese and the Chinese to Learn English.

Geez… still wonder why I spent 15 year in the army to defend this crap piece of land that is not even inhabited by Singaporean.

Law Minister don't know the Law?

Elections do not change president's powers
By Tessa Wong

LAW Minister K Shanmugam said on Friday that the process of direct elections does not change the scope of the Elected President's powers as set out in the Constitution.

And the Constitution states that the President can speak on issues only as authorised by the Cabinet, he said at a Institute of Policy Studies forum.

"If a head of state challenges the Government, he will be acting unconstitutionally," Mr Shanmugam added.

The 1991 amendment to the Constitution, which made the presidency an elected position, gave the president veto powers in five areas, including the spending of past reserves.

He was speaking at an Institute of Policy Studies forum on the role of the roles, responsibilities and power of the elected president. Ambassador-at-large Professor Tommy Koh and constitutional expert Professor Thio Li-Ann also spoke at the forum, which was held at Orchard Hotel.


Every once in a while one of these over paid brainless goof will say something that is totally STUPID and therefore make themselves the laughing stock for the rest of their life.

What this Idiot basically is telling you that the incumbent do not fear the President as he is their Puppet.

“the President can speak on issues only as authorised by the Cabinet”

To me I think Shanmugam has just shot himself in both his feet.

He is showing how dumb he is and how arrogant the PAP is.

Now one more of these PAP guys go into the History of stupid quotes.

I scratch you back and you scartch mine OK Tony?

10,000-strong Tan Clan backs Tony Tan for president
By Cai Haoxiang

THE 10,000-strong Federation of Tan Clan Associations has thrown its weight behind former deputy prime minister Tony Tan's bid for the presidency - the first group here to publicly do so.

Secretary-general Tan Lian Ker, 80, explained yesterday that the decision to endorse him over three other aspirants with the Tan surname - Dr Tan Cheng Bock, Mr Tan Kin Lian and Mr Tan Jee Say - was due to Dr Tony Tan's association and contributions to the federation.

Dr Tony Tan, 71, has been its honorary adviser since 2006 and his professional assistance and contributions had enhanced the image of the federation and its members, he added.

Speaking to reporters after a dialogue between federation members and Dr Tan, he said it was only proper the federation back Dr Tan over the others, who are not involved in the clan's umbrella body.



Wah lau eh!!!

Look like the Tan Clan is playing safe and put their money on the favourite horse to win so they can get some kick back if he is elected.


It will be useful if the Tan Clan can disclose how and what each of the Tan candidates contributed to the Clan. Giving MONEY? Using their position to help them? Help to distribute food to the poor?

This way the public can judge for themselves what sort of character President Tan is like and also how much can the Tan clan be bought for.